Reply to comment

Proposition to Support State Parks

Funny thing happened when I read the SGV Tribune this morning. I saw an editorial written by a former student of mine, Alfredo Gonzalez. He wrote in support of Prop 21 on the November ballot, which would impose an $18 charge on top of your VLF (Vehicle License Fee) when you register your car. In exchange, you'd get free entry into most state parks that charge a per-vehicle entry fee.

It's a testament to our dysfunctional state budgetary system that policy entrepreneurs need to devise ways for dedicated taxes to support specific programs as a way to save them from the roller coaster of state general fund reliance. Just a few years ago, for example, you might also recall a special "millionaire tax," that was passed by state initiative. The proceeds from that tax is dedicated to mental health services. Also, a few years before that, The Nature Conservancy managed to pass a bond measure with funding dedicated to purchasing new park lands.

Ideally, these single-purpose, ballot box budgeting schemes wouldn't be necessary. The poor budget climate, however, almost mandates that any program that wants a reliable source of revenue will have to pass some sort of single-purpose tax for their own benefit. As a result, I'll almost certainly vote "yes" on the park fee. And you're almost certain to keep seeing more special taxes and fees presented on the ballot.

Reply

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Share This

Bookmark and Share